Opinion: Who would believe it? When unrated is “good”

Opinion: Who would believe it? When unrated is “good”

Roger Flaxman finds lessons for brokers in a fascinating £100,000 case where a firm faced litigation for not using unrated insurers. A casual chat between two solicitors at a local trades Christmas lunch resulted in an extraordinary windfall for one of them. Each represented small practices with similar turnovers of just under £1m. Comparing the cost of their professional indemnity (PI) insurance firm A found they were paying nearly four times the premium paid by firm B.

It rather spoiled the lunch for A and on reflection of this alarming discovery A decided to call his broker to account for the difference.

Litigation against the broker followed which resulted in an out of court settlement of nearly £100,000 to A’s firm, representing “overpayment” of premiums for three consecutive years.

Read the full article in Insurance Age

Sign up to our newsletter

Stay up to date with all the latest news and advice from Flaxmans.